Sequenced DNA from Egyptian mummies revealed that ancient Egyptians had different ancestry and genetic roots from the people south of the Sahara desert.

| Archeaology
October 26, 2024

Genetic analysis reveals a close relationship with Middle Easterners, not central Africans.

The tombs of ancient Egypt have yielded golden collars and ivory bracelets, but another treasure — human DNA — has proved elusive. Now, scientists have captured sweeping genomic information from Egyptian mummies. It reveals that mummies were closely related to ancient Middle Easterners, hinting that northern Africans might have different genetic roots from people south of the Sahara desert.

The study, published on 30 May in Nature Communications1, includes data from 90 mummies buried between 1380 BC, during Egypt’s New Kingdom, and AD 425, in the Roman era. The findings show that the mummies’ closest kin were ancient farmers from a region that includes present-day Israel and Jordan. Modern Egyptians, by contrast, have inherited more of their DNA from central Africans.

Archaeological discoveries and historical documents suggest close ties between Egypt and the Middle East, but “it is very nice that this study has now provided empirical evidence for this at the genetic level”, says evolutionary anthropologist Omer Gokcumen of the State University of New York at Buffalo.

Egypt’s searing climate and the ancient practice of embalming bodies has made the recovery of intact genetic material daunting. The first DNA sequences thought to be from a mummy2 were probably the result of modern contamination, and many scientists are sceptical3 of purported genetic information acquired from the mummy of King Tutankhamun4.

The latest analysis succeeded by bypassing soft tissue — often abundant in Egyptian mummies — to seek DNA from bone and teeth. Researchers carefully screened the DNA to rule out contamination from anyone who had handled the mummies since their excavation a century ago in the ancient town of Abusir el-Meleq.

“More than half of the mummies we studied had pretty decent DNA preservation,” says co-author Johannes Krause, a palaeogeneticist at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena, Germany.

The team “succeeds where previous studies on Egyptian mummies have failed or fallen short”, says Hannes Schroeder, a palaeo­geneticist at the University of Copenhagen. Now, researchers can hope to answer questions such as whether immigration drove ancient-Egyptian population growth, adds Sonia Zakrzewski, a bioarchaeologist at the University of Southampton, UK.

The scientists obtained information about variations in mitochondrial DNA, which is passed from mother to child, from 90 mummies. Because of contamination, the team was able to acquire detailed nuclear DNA, which is inherited from both parents, from only three mummies.

Both types of genomic material showed that ancient Egyptians shared little DNA with modern sub-Saharan Africans. Instead, their closest relatives were people living during the Neolithic and Bronze ages in an area known as the Levant. Strikingly, the mummies were more closely related to ancient Europeans and Anatolians than to modern Egyptians.

The researchers say that there was probably a pulse of sub-Saharan African DNA into Egypt roughly 700 years ago. The mixing of ancient Egyptians and Africans from further south means that modern Egyptians can trace 8% more of their ancestry to sub-Saharan Africans than can the mummies from Abusir el-Meleq.

The new data can’t explain why the ancient Egyptians were so tightly aligned with people from the Middle East. Was it the result of migration, or were the Stone Age hunter-gatherers of northern Africa genetically similar to those of the Levant? It’s too early to tell, Krause says, but there’s a better chance now of getting answers. “This is the first glimpse of the genetic history of Egypt,” he says. “But it’s really just the start.”

 

Review: Top 10 Financial Services in the USA The U.S. financial services industry is a cornerstone of the economy, encompassing banking, investment, insurance, and fintech solutions. The top providers stand out for their innovation, customer service, financial stability, and diverse offerings. Below is a detailed review of the top 10 financial services in the USA as of April 2025, based on revenue, market presence, and customer feedback. JPMorgan Chase & Co.JPMorgan Chase is the largest U.S. bank by revenue ($158.1 billion in 2023) and market cap ($744.02 billion). It offers investment banking, consumer banking, asset management, and commercial banking. Its Chase brand serves millions with credit cards, mortgages, and digital banking. The firm leads in fintech innovation, investing in AI and blockchain. Bank of America CorporationWith $93.9 billion in revenue, Bank of America serves 68 million clients through 3,900 financial centers and award-winning digital banking. It provides banking, wealth management, and investment services. Its focus on small businesses and ESG initiatives enhances its reputation. Wells Fargo & CompanyWells Fargo, with $73.8 billion in revenue, offers banking, mortgages, and investment products. Known for its extensive retail banking network, it serves one in three U.S. households. Investments in mobile banking and a strong community focus make it a reliable choice. Citigroup Inc.Citigroup generates $70.7 billion in revenue and operates globally, offering retail banking, investment banking, and wealth management. Its digital platforms and international presence, especially in Mexico and Asia, make it a key player for institutional and individual clients. Goldman Sachs Group Inc.Goldman Sachs, with a market cap of $200.75 billion, excels in investment banking and wealth management. Serving corporations and high-net-worth individuals, it’s known for strategic advisory and innovative financial products. Its 2023 revenue growth of 15.3% highlights its strength. Morgan StanleyMorgan Stanley, with $221.44 billion in market cap and 16.2% revenue growth in 2021, focuses on wealth management, investment banking, and institutional securities. Its client-centric approach and digital tools cater to both retail and corporate clients. Capital One Financial CorporationCapital One, with $34.3 billion in revenue, is known for credit cards, auto loans, and digital banking. Its tech-driven approach, including AI for fraud prevention, enhances customer experiences. It serves millions through its online-only banking platform. American Express CompanyAmerican Express generates $63.27 billion in revenue, offering payment cards, merchant services, and travel solutions. Its premium Centurion card and online banking division cater to affluent clients. It ranks among the top fintech firms by value. U.S. BancorpU.S. Bancorp, with $601 billion in assets, provides banking, investment, and payment services. Its diversified offerings and strong regional presence make it a trusted choice for individual and corporate clients. It employs 70,000 people and emphasizes customer service. The Progressive Corporation Progressive, with a market cap of $140.31 billion, is a leading insurer offering auto, home, and commercial insurance. Its tech-driven pricing models and digital claims processing ensure affordability and convenience, making it a top financial service provider. Selecting the Best Service The best financial service depends on your needs—whether banking, investment, or insurance. Compare fees, digital tools, and customer reviews on platforms like J.D. Power or Glassdoor. For instance, JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America lead in banking, while Progressive excels in insurance. Regularly reassess providers to align with your financial goals, as market dynamics and innovations evolve.

Related Posts